All of the "NO" arguments come from people who seem to know nothing about space. Potential organisms to be found in space such as on Mars offer exactly the same value to the scientific community, and perhaps more, as the conditions would be far more extreme than those found on the Earth.
We can never know exactly which benefits will emerge from the space programme in future, but we do know that we will constantly meet new obstacles in pursuit of our goals, and in overcoming them will find new solutions to old problems. It does seem that NASA are having a bad time with their probes at the moment but they have to keep trying, and the MPL was cheap in comparison to other ventures in the past.
There are many things in our world that have not discovered yet; do cures to AIDS and cancer ring a bell?
Basically, I think that the only reason that we are so interested in exploring our own planet is because it is "our" planet, and we are under the absurd impression that we must know our own environment before branching out into others, when truthfully, doing both at the same time is an ideal opportunity that we seem to be taking for granted.
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Today, the energy storage technology company leads the charge in battery pack innovation, safety and reliability for vehicles, stationary, and personal power products. Velcor and non-stick pans! Stop commenting on here, go dedicate your life to helping the "starving and needy".
At the moment we have all our eggs in one basket, only by exploring and one day colonising can we ensure the future of the human race. Is the cost of space adventure unjustified while poverty exists in many parts of the world?
Exploration of any kind puts our current situation in perspective and increases our useful knowledge. We people in your country we are like family and you have to help family.
There are endless possibilities, ranging from solar energy farms to revolutionary and cheap intercontinental transportation. The cost of this exploration is very low in comparison to the benefits it has given us.
We simply don't have the money or resources. Furthering our understanding of how the universe came into being, and ultimately how we came into being, cannot be measured as useful solely in terms of cost.
We cant have all our eggs in one basket.
Money could be allocated for education. So that means we should give up? There are countless countries that can act as prime spots for solar power harvesting but need to be allied with efficient storage technology for energy balance due to peak daytime generation due to the nature of solar generation.
These items are simply a luxury we cannot afford and we do not need them. Or should we in fact spend more on exploring space, to ensure greater success? If there are things out there they don't hurt us. Copyright Group Discussion Ideas.
We all know, unless we're dillusional, that our planet won't last forever found out through Space exploration, BTWand that how long it lasts relies heavily on our surrounding environment. It is a fact the exploring the space can lead to salient discovery of all the valuable aspects in the world.
David Wilsher, United Kingdom Too cheap? Wells and rocket technology was developed to try to realize this vision. With electricity the power is instant. Space exploration gave impetus to projects that have been useful, as well as providing valuable scientific knowledge.
Our goal here is to create a balance, not to give up one option for another. Humanity is the number one priority; keeping the human race alive is a necessity. China first launched a person into space 42 years after the launch of Vostok 1, on 15 Octoberwith the flight of Yang Liwei aboard the Shenzhou 5 Divine Vessel 5 spacecraft.
Later much longer duration surface missions were achieved, including over six years of Mars surface operation by Viking 1 from to and over two hours of transmission from the surface of Venus by Venera 13 inthe longest ever Soviet planetary surface mission.
This solid foundation will help us provide the same Romeo Power technology used by U. Mars is a tiny but important part of it all. Tom Fisher, USA I believe the large sums of money spent on space exploration are well worth the time and money when it works. The Space exploration program is in no way "wasted money".
Man lived for thousands of years off of the land and many dumb animals still manage to pull it off. And NASA has succeeded. They carried small payloads that allowed them to measure attributes including air temperature and cosmic ray impacts.A major obstacle to having a robust human space exploration program funded by government, such as by the US government, is the knee-jerk reaction of many who.
Space Exploration inspires our young people to achievements in education, especially in science, engineering, mathematics, and technical subjects. 2. Space Exploration requires innovation and technological advancement which improves the national economy directly and for the long term.
Space Exploration vs. Poverty People in poverty drinking contaminated water A family living in a third world contry 25 people die at the hands of poverty every day Not all spaceships make it into outer space Costs about $ to send a spaceship into outerspace About half the wold lives.
Space exploration is a waste of resources. If we wish to tackle the problems of over-population, or of the depletion of resources, we must deal with them on the Earth instead of chasing an elusive dream.
Space exploration is worth the money, because it is one of the few things that can unite this country. From the time the United States put its first satellite into orbit in response to Russia's Sputnik and President Kennedy's promise to put a man on the moon, Americans were enthralled by.
Priyamvada Gopal: Critics say India has too much poverty for such an endeavour. But space exploration should not be the preserve of the rich west.Download